Legal Opinion

Pfaff, Administratrix v. Clements

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 1948No. 4-8583PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. P. McPaddin, Justice.

The decisive question is the validity of the alleged family settlement.

In 1946, Samuel Ernest Pfaff died intestate, survived only by (a) Terrence Pfaff, a son; (b) Justine Pfaff Petre, a daughter; and (c) two grandchildren, Carel Heizman Clements and Carl E. Heizman II, who were the only children of Ernestine Pfaff Heizman, a daughter of Samuel Ernest Pfaff, who had predeceased her father. Terrence Pfaff was appointed administrator of the estate of Samuel Ernest Pfaff, but before completion of the administration, Terrence Pfaff died intestate and childless. He was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  2. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Walworth v. AbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Boyd v. RobinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Pate v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Jones v. BalentineCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Brewer v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Machen v. MachenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Machen v. MachenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API