Black v. Vermont Marble Company
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated and referred to in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Action to recover from the defendant certain moneys received by it upon a sale by the sheriff of certain merchandise belonging to the defendant.
The facts connected with the transaction are given in the opinion in an action between the same parties reported at 137 Cal. 683, [70 Pac. 776], the difference between the two actions being that the former was an action in claim and delivery for property purchased by the defendant at the sheriff’s sale therein referred to, while this is for moneys received by the defendant from the sheriff upon the sale by him to other persons. The defendant sets up…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Doyle v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perkins Manufacturing Co. v. Clinton Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Boteler v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- First National Bank v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lee v. Memphis Pub. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943