Legal Opinion

United States v. Casey Newsom

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1974No. 73-3615PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Casey Newsom appeals from his jury conviction of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 1951 by threatening to harm the wife of the president of the First National Bank of Mansfield, Louisiana, in an attempt to extort $98,000 in bank funds. We affirm. We address each of the numerous errors asserted by Newsom seriatim.(1) Newsom alleges the indictment failed to set forth the elements of the offense charged. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c) specifies that the indictment “shall be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” This Court has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Messenger v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 4Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Eddie UpshawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Milton Robbins A/K/A Mickey Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. Alan Dean Hudson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judsonlee DraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Raul Miranda, AKA 'Wimpy,'Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judsonlee DraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API