Legal Opinion

Alan Dean Hudson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1967No. 24523PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of violating the counterfeiting laws. 18 U.S.C.A. § 472. He contends that the trial court erred in denying him the right to cross-examine the prosecution’s chief witness in an effort to impeach his testimony. He proposed to ask the witness whether he was connected with prostitution, narcotics, or pornography. He made no effort to show a conviction of a felony or of a crime involving moral turpitude. The trial court did not err in so limiting the cross-examination. The scope of cross-examination rests largely within the discretion of the trial court. Grant v. United…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herman Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Clarence Edward Grant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Fred M. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Richard Case Nagell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Anthony Antone, Manuel Gispert, Larry Neil Miller, Frank Diecidue, A/K/A "The Under Boss," Frank Boni, Jr., and Homer Rex DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. George Camillo JacquillonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. United States v. Walter MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API