Legal Opinion

Menken v. 31st District Court

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1989No. Docket 107923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action for declaratory relief, plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order denying such relief. We affirm.

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he is an attorney who frequently files writs of execution in the 31st District Court. Plaintiff alleged he has requested that such writs be returned to him for service by a court officer of his choice, but the court has refused all such requests for the reason that only a court officer appointed by the 31st District Court or a deputy sheriff could serve a writ of execution issued by that court. Plaintiff requested that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Odette v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Coleman v. BoltonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michigan State v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. City of Lake Angelus v. Oakland County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. 36th District Court v. Michigan American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Council 25, Local 917Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. City of Lake Angelus v. Oakland County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API