Legal Opinion
Bolle v. Hume
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1993No. 91-CV-1448PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was brought by appellants Susanna Bolle and the Estate of Christopher Bolle, to determine the lawful beneficiary of Christopher Bolle’s life insurance benefits. The trial court granted summary judgment to appellee Jeffery Elizabeth Hume, the divorced wife of the decedent. We affirm.
I
Decedent Christopher Bolle (Bolle) and appellee Jeffery Hume (Hume) were married in 1980 and separated in 1986. In November 1986, having been recently employed as an associate in a Washington, D.C. firm, Bolle executed a “Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue Flexible Benefits Program Enrollment Form”…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. National Reo Management, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Claytor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- 2301 M Street Cooperative Association v. Chromium, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.