Legal Opinion
Claytor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 3, 1995No. 92-CV-39PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellants Grover Claytor, Frank Keelan, Chester Turner, and their wives filed suit against several manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos products, seeking compensation for injuries allegedly resulting from exposure to asbestos. 1 The trial court entered summary judgment against appellants on most of their claims. Appellants bring this appeal against only four of the original defendants: Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and GAF Corporation. Each pair of appellants seeks slightly different relief. Specifically,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cerberus International, Ltd. v. Apollo Management L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Weakley v. Burnham Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Ferrell v. RosenbaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Service Employees Int'l Union Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.