Legal Opinion

Caramucci v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 27, 1987No. 513-86TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff, formerly an agent with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), seeks reimbursement of independent counsel legal expenses he incurred in connection with defense of a civil action for alleged unlawful disclosure of taxpayer information. The action is currently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The court finds for the reasons discussed herein that there are no material facts in dispute and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

I. Factual Background

The following facts are either not materially in dispute, or are drawn…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McBryde v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Mullane v. Breaking Media, Inc. et.al.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API