Cavitt v. Raje
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion for a change of place of trial. George E. Crothers, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion by defendant for a change of the place of trial.
There is absolutely no merit in the motion to dismiss the appeal, and, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the affidavits in the record show that the defendant at the time of the commencement of the action resided in the county of Los Angeles.
In the defendant’s demand for a change of the place of trial, in the notice of motion, and in several of the affidavits which were filed in the proceeding, there were many interlineations and erasures. This is so with reference to the affidavit of merits…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nolan v. McduffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Humphreys v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Watkins v. DegenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- First National Bank of Oakland v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McGowan v. Supreme Court of the Independent Order of ForestersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dennis v. OverholtzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Jay v. DollarhideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Consolidated Loan Co. v. HarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Rosenberg v. C. W. Clarke Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Christie v. BandonOregon Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.