Consolidated Loan Co. v. Harman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Appeal from judgment rendered against defendant Louis Harman upon a continuing guaranty signed by him.
Defendant’s wife (under the name of Charlotte Silver) was a partner with Fred Gusinow in conducting business under the name of Frosty Foods. The partnership needed more money, had been refused further credit at the Santa Monica branch of Bank of America, was about to try the Bishop branch but did not expect to succeed. Gusinow explained the situation to defendant, who agreed to give a continuing guaranty of any indebtedness of Frosty Foods not exceeding $50,000 at any one time. Gusinow told…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Humphreys v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Coleman v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lasky v. BewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Turner v. BillagramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Starrett v. ShepardWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Dennis v. OverholtzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Kabzenell v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.