Legal Opinion

Ex parte Kendall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1885No. 12,172PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zollars, C. J.:Being charged in an indictment with murder in the first degree, appellants were committed and are held in jail. By a proceeding in habeas corpus, instituted in the court below, they sought to be admitted to bail. Upon the hearing this was refused, and they were remanded into custody. They appeal. The case is before us upon the evidence, and it is our duty, in a case of this kind, to examine and pass upon it. Ex Parte Heffren, 27 Ind. 87; Ex Parte Sutherlin, 56 Ind. 595; Ex Parte Walton, 79 Ind. 600.

An indictment for murder duly returned implies prima facie that the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte HeffrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Ex parte JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Ex parte SutherlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jones v. DarnallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. In re LosassoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Loren Hamilton Fry v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Ex parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API