Legal Opinion
Stevens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided March 13, 1969No. Nos. 23, 24PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParrott, J.
In these consolidated chancery causes complainants seek payment of unsatisfied judgments awarded against Benny Worley in an earlier suit for damages growing out of an automobile accident.
The bills aver the car involved in the accident and driven by Worley was being operated with the consent, permission and knowledge of the owner, Sherman Lilly; that the automobile was insured under a policy of liability insurance issued to Lilly by defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
Defendant’s answer to this bill denies the terms and conditions of the policy afforded coverage to Benny…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hayes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- Hunter v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Garrett v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Couch v. CockroftCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Still v. Commerce Union Bank of Nashville (In Re Custom Caps, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Johnson v. Tomlinson (In Re Tomlinson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Coale v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.