Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Urchs

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 5, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

In Matter of Krooss (302 N. Y. 424) the testator bequeathed a remainder to his children with a proviso that, should either of said children die prior to the death of the life tenant “ leaving descendants ”, said descendants should take the share of their parent. In that decision it was held that the testator had conferred a gift upon each remainder legatee which would be divested only upon two conditions, the first, that the named remainderman die during the trust term and, the second, that there be descendents of the named remainderman to receive the gift. The language of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Oliver v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. In re the Accounting of KroossNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Lamb v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. In re the Accounting of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PattersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  2. In re the Estate of KindermannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API