In re the Estate of Kindermann
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Harry G. Herman, S.
In article ‘ ‘ third ’ ’ of her will the testatrix directed that estate taxes: “ be paid from my residuary estate, and that no part thereof be charged against any legatee, devisee or beneficiary other than other receiving my residuary estate.”
Section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law mandates that the amount of the estate tax be equitably apportioned among the persons benefited except where the testator otherwise directs in his will. A direction such as set forth above exempts preresiduary dispositions from apportionment of taxes but necessitates apportionment of taxes within…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- In re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
- In re AldrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate CordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re the Estate of ColliaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
- In re the Estate KindermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967