Legal Opinion · Dissent

Huckabee v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2000No. 98-1018Published

1DissentJustice Hecht

Since a public figure cannot recover damages for defamation without clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with actual malice,11 would hold, like the United States Supreme Court2 and the courts of thirty-seven states,3 that he like*431wise cannot defeat a motion for summary judgment without evidence of the same quality and quantity. This does not mean that the plaintiff in such a case must prove actual malice in response to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. It means only that once the defendant has adduced summary judgment evidence that it did not act with actual…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API