Legal Opinion

Engel v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1923No. 22467PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colby, District Judge.

This is an action brought in the district court for Lancaster county, prosecuted under the federal employers’ liability act by the legal representative of Adam Engel, deceased, who in his lifetime was a section foreman in appellant’s employ in the city of Lincoln, to recover damages because of the alleged negligent fatal injury of the said Adam Engel by appellant.

The amended petition, after alleging matters of jurisdiction, besides pleading the violation of an ordinance of the city of Lincoln restricting the speed of locomotives or trains to four miles an hour within the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Erie Railroad v. PuruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. NowickiIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GundersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Bell v. CrookNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Halliday v. RaymondNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Cotten v. StolleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Anderson v. NincehelserNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API