Legal Opinion

Coosa Land Co. v. Edgerton Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1928No. 5968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. “In view of the complicated character of cases generally referred to auditors, and the length of the resulting record, there are specially strong reasons for requiring the strictest compliance with the *809provisions of the statute that all exceptions shall clearly and distinctly specify the errors complained of. The exception should contain all facts and rulings necessary to show harmful error. It should not be so incomplete as to force the court to search through the record to find error.” Armstrong v. Am. Nat. Bank of Macon, 149 Ga. 165 (2) (99 S. E. 881), and cit. See Barnes v. Commercial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Miller & Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co. v. CorrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Armstrong v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. Barnes v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Kytle v. KytleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Rogers v. JohnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Persons v. PersonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Almand v. CrockettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API