Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Houston

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1940No. 13350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

1. If a plaintiff fails to make out a prima facie ease, or if, admitting all the facts proved and all reasonable deductions from them, the plaintiff ought not to recover, a nonsuit will be granted. Code, § 110-310.

2. The petition being based on the theory that a conveyance absolute on its face, wherein the plaintiffs’ intestate was grantor, and one of the defendants the grantee, was in reality a mere security deed, and that the indebtedness had been paid, so as to reinvest the legal title in the plaintiffs’ intestate, the burden was in all events on the plaintiffs to make it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eastlick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Copelin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Rucker v. RuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Armstrong v. American National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shea v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Gilbert v. CarsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. Butler v. HazelrigsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API