Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 22, 1924No. 11482Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Cothran :

I concur in the result attained by the opinion of Mr. Justice Eraser, which is the dismissal of the prosecution, upon the ground of want of jurisdiction, and not upon the ground that the demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained, for the ground upon which the dismissal is adjudged was not the ground of the demurrer.

The Act of 1923, in prescribing a new element in the offense declared by the Act of 1909 (26 St. at Large, p. 18), the intent to defraud, and by its manifest provisions, was intended to cover the whole subject of “bogus checks,” and embraced new…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API