Legal Opinion
In Re NAYY CHAPLAINCY
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2012No. Misc. No. 2007-0269PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ sixth motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a). The plaintiffs claim that the Navy Chaplain Corps’ selection board process, in which Navy chaplains cast votes resulting in the promotion of other chaplains, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. More specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the Navy’s selection board…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- In Re: Navy ChaplaincyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In Re: Navy ChaplaincyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013