Legal Opinion

Maloff v. City Commission On Human Rights

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Notwithstanding an erroneous reference to a "fatal taint” *904standard of review, it is clear that the New York City Commission on Human Rights concluded, based upon sufficient evidence (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Bl-9.0), that the unsatisfactory rating given respondent Schriber was not based upon legitimate nondiscriminatory grounds but, rather, upon grounds discriminatory in nature. (See Matter of Maloff v Commission on Human Rights [Anilyan], 46 NY2d 908 [decided herewith]; Matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pace College v. Commission on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. New York Institute of Technology v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Matter of Maloff v. City Comm'n on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Matter of Maloff v. City Comm'n on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State Division of Human Rights v. Human Rights Commission of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API