Maloff v. City Commission On Human Rights
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Notwithstanding an erroneous reference to a "fatal taint” *904standard of review, it is clear that the New York City Commission on Human Rights concluded, based upon sufficient evidence (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Bl-9.0), that the unsatisfactory rating given respondent Schriber was not based upon legitimate nondiscriminatory grounds but, rather, upon grounds discriminatory in nature. (See Matter of Maloff v Commission on Human Rights [Anilyan], 46 NY2d 908 [decided herewith]; Matter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pace College v. Commission on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- New York Institute of Technology v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Matter of Maloff v. City Comm'n on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Matter of Maloff v. City Comm'n on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- State Division of Human Rights v. Human Rights Commission of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981