Legal Opinion

People v. Randall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1980No. 78-2092PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

The defendant, seeking to have a bond forfeiture set aside, filed a letter with the court. The letter stated he had been hospitalized on the date of the forfeiture. The court, after examining the letter, concluded that the letter was a forgery and, after a continuance, but without granting a hearing or receiving any evidence, found the defendant guilty of contempt and sentenced him to six months in jail. The defendant appeals, contending that the evidence did not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that he was denied due process of law. We agree with both contentions and reverse.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. People v. JavarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. GholsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Zokoych v. SpaldingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. LoughranIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sunset Travel, Inc. v. LovecchioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Baier v. HamptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re the Marriage of NeiswingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. AbdennabiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Baier v. HamptonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API