Legal Opinion
Sharpe v. Conole
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 15, 2004No. Docket Nos. 01-7044, 01-9019PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLEESON, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Thomas Sharpe appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action. The complaint under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. § 248 (“FACE Act”), was based on various alleged acts of the defendants, including harassment of Sharpe and his patients, interference with patient care and education, suspension of Sharpe, and revocation of his medical license. For the reasons stated below, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
BACKGROUND
Sharpe was a physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology át E.J.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. WeslinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Sharpe v. ConoleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. KoppCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Sharpe v. ConoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. DillardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Liberty Surplus Insurance v. Segal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Pelosi v. SpotaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.