Legal Opinion
Sharpe v. Conole
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 7, 2000No. 7:99-cv-00971PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, District Judge.
In a prior Decision & Order, familiarity with which is assumed, the Court set forth the factual and procedural background of this action. See Sharpe v. Conole, 99-CV-971, March 31, 2000, Dkt. No. 70. 1 Presently before the Court is Defendants Conole, Leader, Rigor, Kumar, and Scheussler’s motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) to dismiss the remaining causes of action under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. § 248 (“FACE”) for the following reasons: (1) the Complaint fails to state a cause of action under FACE…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michael Fonte and Gilda Fonte v. The Board of Managers of Continental Towers CondominiumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Daniel J. Balint and James A. KetchumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. J. Fred Hart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. George L. Wilson and Colin L. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Roman v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharpe v. ConoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Sharpe v. ConoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GagnonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003