Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc. v. Huey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1977No. 76-350PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In a sense this case is a sequel to Borden, Inc. v. Smith, 252 Ark. 295, 478 S.W. 2d 744 (1972). There Vogel’s, Inc., a subsidiary of the appellant Borden, Inc., inserted in its employment contracts a provision prohibiting former employees from competing with Borden for one year after the termination of their employment and within a territory comprising 63 of Arkansas’s 75 counties and parts of three neighboring states. We held the restrictions invalid, on the ground that the prohibited territory was unreasonably large.

After that decision, according to the testimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Borden, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Miller v. Fairfield Bay, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Security Services, Inc. v. VodraNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stuart C. Irby Company, Inc. v. Brandon TiptonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Girard v. Rebsamen InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Statco Wireless, LLC v. Southwestern Bell Wireless, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Freeman v. Brown Hiller, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API