Legal Opinion
McMahan & Co. v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 26, 1989No. 89 Civ. 0782 (MBM)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR REARGUMENT
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for reargument pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and Rule 3(j) of this Court’s Civil Rules. That motion is denied.
Motions for reargument “are granted when new facts come to light or when it appears that controlling precedents were overlooked.” Weissman v. Fruchtman, 658 F.Supp. 547 (S.D.N.Y.1987). The proponent of such a motion is not supposed to treat the court’s initial decision as the opening of a dialogue in which that party may then use Rule 3® to advance new facts and theories in response to the court’s rulings. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carolco Pictures Inc. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Antone v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Weissman v. FruchtmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Allegaert v. WarrenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- American Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. CochraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Robins v. Max Mara, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. WorleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Thorsen v. Sons of NorwayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.