Legal Opinion

Freemantle v. United States Hoffman Machinery Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint and granting affirmative judgment in favor of the defendant upon its counterclaim, upon a motion made *635by the defendant under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. This action was brought to rescind a contract for the purchase of certain laundry machinery which had been entered into between the plaintiff, as vendee, and the defendant as vendor, on March 9, 1954. The plaintiff contended that the capacity of the machinery was not sufficient for the needs of her business, in violation of an implied warranty of fitness claimed to have arisen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lumbrazo v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Railroad Waterproofing Corp. v. Memphis Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pipe Welding Supply Co. Inc. v. Gas Atmospheres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API