Legal Opinion

Koch v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 13, 2001No. 46747-6-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

At the request of Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. (MOE), appellant Alberta Koch’s insurer, respondent Dr. John McDermott conducted an independent review of Koch’s medical records. Based on Dr. McDermott’s report, MOE declined to make payments under Koch’s personal injury protection (PIP) coverage for several months. Because Koch failed to establish a genuine factual issue as to whether Dr. McDermott’s opinion was dishonest or offered in bad faith, the trial court properly granted summary judgment and dismissed Koch’s claims for tortious interference with a contract and violation of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Estate of AlbergoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Building Industry Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Manteufel v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Koch v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Manteufel v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API