Legal Opinion

Manuel v. Haselden

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 23, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*797Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

■On and prior to October 1,1919, appellees and plaintiffs below, J. R., S. G. and J. S. Haselden, were the joint owners of a tract of land in Garrard county containing about 80% acres. For the purpose of dividing it among the owners, they advertised its sale at public auction on the premises to be held on the date mentioned, and at that sale the appellants and defendants below, J. T. Manuel and wife, Fannie Manuel, became the purchasers at the price of $240.00 per acre. On the next day they executed a written contract to purchase the land on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. McMillan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Burdon v. SeitzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
  2. Cooper v. EnsorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Osborn v. Apperson Lodge, F. A. M. No. 195Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API