Legal Opinion

West v. Bauduit

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 3, 1929No. 4779PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff (appellee here) in an action of assumpsit in the Supreme Court of the District. The declaration is in two counts. In the first count, plaintiff sought to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by her to defendant’s testatrix, Sarah Y. Dunlop, for approximately four years; in the second count, to- recover for the use and occupation of part of plaintiff’s premises by the defendant executor for two years and five months after his appointment and qualification as executor.

The evidence for the plaintiff was to the effect…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Hamilton v. ThirstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Mills v. JoinerSupreme Court of Florida · 1884
  5. Butler v. KentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kalis v. LeahyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Stutler v. HeflinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API