Legal Opinion

Stutler v. Heflin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 1942No. 13886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, District Judge.

Defendants have filed a motion for judgment in their favor, or in the alternative for a new trial.

The Motion for Judgment.

This action seeks compensation for room and board alleged to have been furnished by plaintiff to one Mollie Bee, deceased. She resided at plaintiff’s home a long period of time. There was evidence that it was forty years. She was a sister of the wife of plaintiff. Plaintiff’s wife died in 1940. Their only child, Ross Stutler, died in 1941. Miss Bee died shortly thereafter. Her will, dated May 18, 1940, bequeathed her entire estate to Mrs. Stutler,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Boaze v. Windridge & Handy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. George Washington University v. Riggs Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waters v. National Life & Accident Ins.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API