Legal Opinion

Matheny v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided December 11, 2007No. 3:06-0565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.

The plaintiff has filed a Motion to Alter or Amend (Docket No. 103), to which defendant TVA has responded in opposition (Docket No. 106). For the reasons discussed herein, the plaintiffs Motion will be granted, and the portion of the court’s December 6, 2007 Order granting judgment to the plaintiff in the amount of $2,159,153.00 compensatory damages will be modified as set forth herein.

The plaintiffs motion is most properly analyzed under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that all such motions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. GTE Government Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matheny Ex Rel. Matheny v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Becky Matheny v. Tenn. Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re Estate of Charles B. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API