United States v. Doe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellants seek reversal of their convictions on drug and firearms charges.1 Several claims of prejudicial error are staked out, but we deem it appropriate to address only two: improper admission of testimony by an expert witness, and improper argument to the jury by the prosecutor. We find merit in these contentions and accordingly reverse.
I. THE BACKGROUND
Suspecting drug activity in an apartment,' police officers engaged an informant to make a purchase therein. The informant reported that a person who spoke with a Jamaican accent sold him…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jaime Soto, Also Known as Leonel GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.