Ted David Howze v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Ted David Howze appeals his conviction by the District Court, sitting without a jury, of willfully refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces, 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. The issue is whether Howze’s Local Board erred when it refused to reopen his classification after Howze submitted a SSS form 118 (“Dependency Questionnaire”) on January 20, 1966, 32 C.F.R. §§ 1625.2, 1625.4. Petrie v. United States, 407 F.2d 267, 9th Cir. (1969).
In his form 118, Howze stated that his father (age 62) and his mother (age 58) received a total of $36 a month in social security benefits, that neither had any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Russell FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- 6 Fair empl.prac.cas. 22, 6 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8685 Samuel L. Woods v. North American Rockwell Corporation, a Corporation, and Local 952, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Cornelious Lockhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Vaccarino v. Officer of DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.