Legal Opinion

Esque v. City of Huntington

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1927No. 5894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

This is an action in which the plaintiff recovered damages for personal injuries sustained through the negligence of a fellow servant while employed by the defendant in the repair of one of its streets. The action is based upon Section 26 of the workmen’s compensation act, (Chapter 15-P Code), the defendant not having been a subscriber to the compensation fund at the time of the injury. This section provides:

“All employers subject to this act, the State of West Virginia excepted, who shall not have elected to pay into the workmen’s compensation fund the premiums provided by this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Gregory's Adm'r v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State ex rel. City of Northfield v. District Court of Rice CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Lincoln Park Coal & Brick Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willis v. O'BRIENWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. BowmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. FabianMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Foley v. TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Whitt v. State Workmens Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API