Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 2003No. A03A0333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following the denial of his motion for discharge and acquittal, Hubert Smith appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in its finding that his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial had not been violated. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

This case is before us on a pre-trial appeal based on the holdings of the Supreme Court of Georgia. We note our failure to follow United States Supreme Court precedent in United States v. MacDonald 1 on the issue of pre-trial direct appeal on speedy trial denials based on alleged Sixth Amendment federal constitutional…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Boseman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sosniak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Higgins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Mayfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Weldon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Kristin Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API