Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Winkel

District Court, Northern Mariana Islands

Decided April 29, 1981No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 81-0019Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MEMORANDUM DECISION

On April 29, 1981 the Court heard defendant Adrian Winkel's motion to quash plaintiff's subpoena duces tecum and his alternative motion for a protective order against the takiijg of his oral deposition. Having carefully considered the applicable law, the record, and the arguments of counsel, the Court denies both motions. The Court will order defendant to be orally deposed subject to a protective order described in this decision.

FACTS

Plaintiff filed his complaint against defendants Winkel and Watt on April 24, 1981. As to defendant Winkel, the gravamen of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Dicky D. Voegeli and Sharon Voegeli v. Harvard R. Lewis and Methodist Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Arlett Peoples v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Shirley v. ChestnutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Northside Realty Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API