Legal Opinion
Browne v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1985No. C4-85-1204PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of a third party complaint. The trial court ordered the dismissal, under Minn.R.Civ.P. 12.02(5), of The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company’s (Aetna) complaint against Norman Perl and Richard Hunegs, individually and as DeParq, Anderson, Perl, Hunegs & Rudquist, a professional corporation (Perl), and Cortlen Cloutier, individually and as Cortlen Cloutier, P.A. (Cloutier). We affirm.
FACTS
The main action in this case was brought on January 23, 1985, by Willard Browne against his former employer, Aetna. Browne’s suit alleges that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Continental Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Olson v. BurtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Discipline of PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Erickson v. EricksonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Lyman Lumber Co. v. Dior Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987