Legal Opinion
Robert L. Arnsberg, and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1985No. CA 83-3590, CA 83-3620PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Robert Arnsberg filed an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2401(b), 2671-80 (1982), and the fourth amendment, alleging that United States agents had arrested and imprisoned him in violation of Oregon tort law and the United States Constitution. He joined the arresting officers as defendants in the action under the constitutional tort theory of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Arnsberg on one of his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pritchett v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Liranzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ronald E. Ting v. United States of America the Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Internal Revenue Service Joe SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Abdon Delgadillo-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.