State v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — Hen. Ralph 8. Latshaw, Judge. (1) The court erred in failing to quash the information because the law is unconstitutional, in that it violates Section 30 of Article 2 of the Constitution of-the State, which says that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — Hen. Ralph 8. Latshaw, Judge. (1) The court erred in failing to quash the information because the law is unconstitutional, in that it violates Section 30 of Article 2 of the Constitution of-the State, which says that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. (2) The court erred in failing to hold that under the law the Missouri Dental Board had no right or authority to revoke both the certificate of registration and ■ the license. (3) ■ The court erred in refusing to sustain appellant’s demurrer for the reason…
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant, Morris Russell Wolfe, was informed against at the September term, 1918, of the Criminal Court of Jackson County, on a charge of having practiced dentistry without being legally registered and without having a license authorizing him to do so. Upon his plea of not guilty, he was tried on the 7th day of the January term, 1919, and the case was taken under advisement until the 13th day of said January term, when defendant was adjudged guilty as charged and a fine was assessed against him of $100. It was contended (and still is contended) by defendant that the statute under which he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. Missouri Dental BoardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. Missouri Dental BoardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921