Legal Opinion
Graham County v. Dowell
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1937No. Civil No. 3899PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Graham County, hereinafter called petitioner, acting by and through its board of supervisors, filed in this court an original petition for a writ of mandamus against the members of the Arizona State Highway Commission, hereinafter called respondents, directing them to supervise and maintain a certain highway in Graham County.
Petitioner bases its claim on chapter 26 of the act of the 13th Legislature of Arizona, which reads as follows :
‘ ‘ An Act Relating to highways, and directing the state highway commission to designate as a state route the Pima-Hot Springs-Fort Thomas and PimaBryce-Safford…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Champie v. Castle Hot Springs Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Rowland v. McBrideArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Town of Wolcott v. PondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Chicago Anderson Pressed Brick Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Sullins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of Maricopa v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Garcia v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- For Deannexation v. City of GoodyearCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Sjostrum v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.