Legal Opinion

State v. Dawson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1993No. CV-92-0413-SAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

FACTS

Respondents and real parties in interest Ben N. McGowen and H. Gail Knuckey *611(McGowen) filed a complaint in inverse condemnation in the Gila County Superior Court against petitioner, the State of Arizona (state). The amended complaint sought damages for a taking of McGowen’s land along State Route 288 between Globe and Young, Arizona, as a result of runoff water discharged onto McGowen’s property. The Arizona Highway Commission adopted a resolution in 1959 purporting to establish a road on the land, but eminent domain procedures had never been instituted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Huck v. HaralambieArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Champie v. Castle Hot Springs Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gotland v. Town of Cave CreekArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Maricopa v. RoveyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API