Legal Opinion

Frampton v. Dauphin Distribution Services Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Does an architect who has been hired to prepare construction drawings and a foundation design for a proposed warehouse have a duty to warn construction workers of the presence of an existing, overhead power line? The trial court held that no such duty existed in the absence of a contractual assumption thereof. We agree that this is a correct statement of the law. Under the facts of this case, therefore, we will affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of the architect in this action to recover damages on behalf of workmen who were killed or injured when the scaffolding which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Orner v. MallickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Reilly v. Tiergarten Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. National Foundation Co. v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Nicholson v. turner/cargileOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Boyanoski v. Gould Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1999
  5. Frampton v. Dauphin Distribution Services Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API