Legal Opinion

Handelman v. Arquilla

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1950No. 31744PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crampton

The plaintiffs, Charles and Ida Handelman, brought this suit against defendant George Arquilla in the superior court of Cook County for specific performance of a contract whereby defendant undertook to purchase from plaintiffs an unimproved tract of real estate. Defendant filed an answer setting forth two defenses, namely, (1) that plaintiffs made default in performance of the contract, whereupon defendant elected to declare it void; and (2) that plaintiffs’ agent made certain misrepresentations as to the nature of the land, upon which defendant relied in signing the contract. The cause was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kerner v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Klekamp v. KlekampIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Winkelman v. ErwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fitchburg Steam Engine Co. v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Wolf v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Wilkinson v. AppletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Grimes v. AdlespergerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Bamberg v. GriffinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Rizakos v. KekosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API