Legal Opinion

Gleisner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The policy in question is a restricted and limited accident policy in its double-indemnity feature for injuries resulting in death. It provides the principal benefits shall be double if “such injuries are sustained by the insured: . . . (3) by collapse of the outer walls or the burning of a building if the insured is therein at the time of the collapse or commencement of the fire.”

The facts are few and simple. For several days prior to and on the morning of September 15, 1961, the deceased and her husband occupied one unit of a two-unit motel cabin at the Woodland Motel in Door county,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Ætna Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Houlihan v. . Preferred Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Hiatt v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
  5. PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WaltTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API