Legal Opinion

PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Walt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The only question involved in this lawsuit is the construction of a paragraph in the policy of insurance issued by the petitioner. The policy issued was an accident and sickness policy providing for payment in the principal sum of $750 for accidental death, the monthly indemnity at the rate of $60 per month for total disability, with an additional indemnity at the rate of $2 per day during such time as the insured should be confined to a hospital. There is no controversy between the parties in respect to the single indemnity under the policy, and this has been tendered into court by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Ætna Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Houlihan v. . Preferred Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Monroe County Motor Co. v. Tennessee Odin Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  5. Baugh v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Transamerica Insurance Group v. Stephen George Beem and Wife, Joan Beem, Transamerica Insurance Group v. William Douglas BoothCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Quintana v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Sturgill v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  5. Gerald C. O'Neil v. Glens Falls Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API