Legal Opinion

Riley v. City Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1934No. 1244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*293OPINION

By KUNKLE, J.

The evidence can be brought before this court for review only through a bill of exceptions and no such bill of exceptions has been filed. We are required therefore to interpret these interrogatories in the light of the issues as raised by the pleadings. It will be unnecessary to state in detail the issues so raised as counsel are thoroughly familiar with the same.

Interrogatory No. 1 was as follows:

“Could the plaintiff in the exercise of ordinary care for his own safety have seen or heard the street car as it rounded the curve in time to step to a place of safety and thus…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keller v. City Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Howell v. FrostOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Rickman v. Ohio Yellow Cab Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API