Legal Opinion

Howell v. Frost

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1954No. 5041Published

1Opinion of the Court

*470OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion of the plaintiff-appellee seeking an order striking the appellant’s reply brief from the- record for the alleged reason that three exhibits are attached to it, which are no part of the bill of exceptions. Counsel for the appellant, in its brief, admits the three exhibits are no part of the bill, but urges they are relevant and material to the issues presented. The law seems to be well established that this Court, in a law appeal, cannot consider matters foreign to the record; that a reviewing Court can only consider evidence contained in the bill of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riley v. City Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API