Legal Opinion

Frank v. Savage

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 2010No. COA09-1413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

• “In ruling upon a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the trial court. . . should not dismiss the action unless it appears to a certainty that plaintiff is entitled to no relief under any statement of facts which could be proved in support of the claim.” 1 In the present case, the trial court granted Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Tamera Frank and Peter Franklin’s complaint. Treating Plaintiffs allegations as true, we hold that the complaint was sufficient to state claims upon which relief may be granted against Defendant Yancey County Board of Commissioners. We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Anderson v. HollifieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Arroyo v. Scottie's Professional Window Cleaning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Raymond v. RaymondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Manone v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Yeun-Hee Juhnn v. Do-Bum JuhnnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. Garlock v. Wake County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Deal v. City of MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API