Legal Opinion

Woodson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 2002No. 49A04-0109-PC-396PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

KIRSCH, Judge.

In Woodson v. State, 767 N.E.2d 1022 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), this court granted Keith Woodson’s petition for post-convic*477tion relief on his two convictions for attempted murder as an accomplice,1 a Class A felony, on the basis that the jury instructions constituted fundamental error. We remanded the case for a new trial.

The State has petitioned this court for rehearing. Citing Sanders v. State, 765 N.E.2d 591, 592 (Ind.2002), the State argues that our supreme court recently clarified that claims of fundamental error apply only to direct appeals and “are not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Specht v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Conner v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
  3. Means v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Cowherd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Edington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API